Discussion:
Christina Aguilera Nude 3153
(too old to reply)
Ian Buckner
2003-10-03 08:28:43 UTC
Permalink
Christina Aguilera poseing topless
http://home.attbi.com/~charly.mack/ChristinaAguilera.scr
urorljbtngxocboxintqttsyldqlmugzwnqjkmnmwpomxwzqjfptmerwjkrucbqlsieclo
ownk
Note the .scr file extension - this is highly likely to be a virus.

Regards
Ian
unknown
2003-10-03 10:28:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ian Buckner
Christina Aguilera poseing topless
http://home.attbi.com/~charly.mack/ChristinaAguilera.scr
urorljbtngxocboxintqttsyldqlmugzwnqjkmnmwpomxwzqjfptmerwjkrucbqlsieclo
ownk
Note the .scr file extension - this is highly likely to be a virus.
Regards
Ian
highly likly, your joking right?

it is a virus, well more prob a trojan and a lame way of tryin to get people
to install it, this was prob posted by a kid, someone new to the world of
virii, an uneducated person as to the ways of infecting people, GO AND GET A
LIFE YOU SAD GIT!!

sorry they annoy me
Jim Thomas
2003-10-03 13:12:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
it is a virus, well more prob a trojan and a lame way of tryin to get people
to install it, this was prob posted by a kid, someone new to the world of
virii, an uneducated person as to the ways of infecting people, GO AND GET A
LIFE YOU SAD GIT!!
In a recent thread in comp.os.linux.security, it was revealed that the
plural of "virus" is "viruses". "Virii" is not a word. But that does
not stop me from trying to popularize "doofi" as a new word. ;-)
--
Jim Thomas Principal Applications Engineer Bittware, Inc
***@bittware.com http://www.bittware.com (703) 779-7770
Visualize whirled peas.
Jerry Avins
2003-10-04 18:18:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim Thomas
Post by unknown
it is a virus, well more prob a trojan and a lame way of tryin to get
people to install it, this was prob posted by a kid, someone new to
the world of virii, an uneducated person as to the ways of infecting
people, GO AND GET A LIFE YOU SAD GIT!!
In a recent thread in comp.os.linux.security, it was revealed that the
plural of "virus" is "viruses". "Virii" is not a word. But that does
not stop me from trying to popularize "doofi" as a new word. ;-)
I downloaded it into a playpen where I could look at it. The preamble
contains the line "This program cannot be run in DOS mode"

Jerry, Archexemplar of the Goofi
--
When a discovery is new, people say, "It isn't true."
When it becomes demonstrably true, they say, "It isn't useful."
Later, when its utility is evident, they say, "So what? It's old."
a paraphrase of William James
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Ben Bradley
2003-10-05 02:16:53 UTC
Permalink
=20
it is a virus, well more prob a trojan and a lame way of tryin to get =
people to install it, this was prob posted by a kid, someone new to=20
the world of virii, an uneducated person as to the ways of infecting=20
people, GO AND GET A LIFE YOU SAD GIT!!
=20
=20
In a recent thread in comp.os.linux.security, it was revealed that the =
plural of "virus" is "viruses". "Virii" is not a word. But that does =
not stop me from trying to popularize "doofi" as a new word. ;-)
Shouldn't that be spelled "doofii" to be analogous to/orthogonal
with the [nonexistent] word "virii?" I'm not real sure myself, just
wondering - I only took one year of Latin in high school, and unlike
at least one Vice President, I've never been to Latin America.
I downloaded it into a playpen where I could look at it. The preamble=20
contains the line "This program cannot be run in DOS mode"
Don't most MS-Windows executables contain that line?
Jerry, Archexemplar of the Goofi
--=20
When a discovery is new, people say, "It isn't true."
When it becomes demonstrably true, they say, "It isn't useful."
Later, when its utility is evident, they say, "So what? It's old."
a paraphrase of William James
-----
http://mindspring.com/~benbradley
Edward
2003-10-05 16:50:13 UTC
Permalink
unlike at least one Vice President, I've never been to Latin America.
Funny thing was, he was joking. Because it was him/he, nobody was
willing to believe it was a joke.


cheers
Jim Thomas
2003-10-06 13:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ben Bradley
Shouldn't that be spelled "doofii" to be analogous to/orthogonal
with the [nonexistent] word "virii?" I'm not real sure myself, just
wondering - I only took one year of Latin in high school, and unlike
at least one Vice President, I've never been to Latin America.
Well, I never took Latin, and I've never been to Latin America, but
based on the examples of "fungi", "cacti", and "octopi", I came up with
"doofi".

Maybe someone who knows the rules could weigh in on this erm... most
important issue. ;-)
--
Jim Thomas Principal Applications Engineer Bittware, Inc
***@bittware.com http://www.bittware.com (703) 779-7770
In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not
Paul Russell
2003-10-06 14:09:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim Thomas
Post by Ben Bradley
Shouldn't that be spelled "doofii" to be analogous to/orthogonal
with the [nonexistent] word "virii?" I'm not real sure myself, just
wondering - I only took one year of Latin in high school, and unlike
at least one Vice President, I've never been to Latin America.
Well, I never took Latin, and I've never been to Latin America, but
based on the examples of "fungi", "cacti", and "octopi", I came up with
"doofi".
Maybe someone who knows the rules could weigh in on this erm... most
important issue. ;-)
I think you're probably right. If doofus is a regular second declension
masculine noun then it would indeed be doofi. If it's fourth declension
masculine (less common) then it would be doofus (with a long "u"). If
it's an irregular noun then all bets are off.

Paul
Jerry Avins
2003-10-06 15:00:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim Thomas
Post by Ben Bradley
Shouldn't that be spelled "doofii" to be analogous to/orthogonal
with the [nonexistent] word "virii?" I'm not real sure myself, just
wondering - I only took one year of Latin in high school, and unlike
at least one Vice President, I've never been to Latin America.
Well, I never took Latin, and I've never been to Latin America, but
based on the examples of "fungi", "cacti", and "octopi", I came up with
"doofi".
Maybe someone who knows the rules could weigh in on this erm... most
important issue. ;-)
There's radius and radii, but that's a simple substitution of the
plural 'i' for the singular 'us'. (See? Latin has it backwards!)
One could also hypothesize Tedium and Tedii as cousin twins to
Tweedledum and Tweedledee, but the rhyme isn't there.

Jerry
--
"I view the progress of science as ... the slow erosion of the
tendency to dichotomize." Barbara Smuts, U. Mich.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Spiro
2003-10-06 00:03:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jerry Avins
I downloaded it into a playpen where I could look at it. The preamble
There are some nice ways to do this. here's some interesting info:

general info about tools for reversing hostile code under win and *nix
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1637

about reversing win32 nasties using linux (wine + softice, gdb)
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1641




And after forwarding a "your love wish" email to all of my friends
yesterday, I was sure this was from Christina finally making contact
with me. I guess it is possible that I took more than 10 min to foward
it to 500 people. It was very specific about having to forward it in
under 10 min. Ok its my fault it didnt work.
Robert Williams
2003-10-05 03:13:19 UTC
Permalink
fyi ...
This is a trojan for Windows. See the following:
http://us.mcafee.com/virusInfo/default.asp?id=description&virus_k=100723
Christina Aguilera poseing topless
http://home.attbi.com/~charly.mack/ChristinaAguilera.scr
urorljbtngxocboxintqttsyldqlmugzwnqjkmnmwpomxwzqjfptmerwjkrucbqlsiecloownk
Loading...